by Patrick ➕follow (59) ignore (2)
« First « Previous Comments 318 - 357 of 357 Search these comments
A leading expert has spoken out to warn the public about Covid mRNA shots after discovering that the medical trials for the vaccines were rigged to make the injections appear “safe and effective.”
The bombshell was revealed by Raphel Lataster, Ph.D., a renowned researcher and former pharmacist affiliated with the University of Sydney, Australia.
Lataster summarized four studies suggesting that the promise of “safe and effective” COVID-19 immunizations was “exaggerated in clinical trials and observational studies.”
He outlined his arguments on Substack, basing his conclusions on four papers:
A March 2023 paper by lead author Peter Doshi, Ph.D., describing the “case-counting window” bias and its possible effect on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness reporting.
Lataster’s July 2023 response to Doshi’s paper, concluding the same type of bias affected safety reporting.
A July 2023 response by Doshi explaining how case-counting window biases were used to game the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine clinical trials.
Lataster’s own January 2024 paper, which discussed rampant biases in the trials in light of more recent data on myocarditis, a now-recognized side effect of the shots.
The study at the heart of Lataster’s analysis addressed the biases that caused health officials and the media to claim the injections were “safe and effective” for public use.
I don't want to be propagating hoaxes like the "smallpox blanket" hoax, which is still circulating as if it were true.
In so many words—and data—CDC has quietly admitted that all of the indignities of the Covid-19 pandemic management have failed: the masks, the distancing, the lockdowns, the closures, and especially the vaccines; all of it failed to control the pandemic.
all of it failed to control the pandemic.
John Beaudoin has uncovered evidence showing that the CDC (Centers for Data Concealment) is fraudulently failing to assign appropriate ICD-10 codes (U12.9, T88.1 and/or Y59.0) on death certificates for people who have been killed by the mRNA injections.
The CDC appeared to defy President Donald Trump's will by taking part in a vaccine meeting with the World Health Organization this week.
Under executive orders, the CDC was banned from communicating from WHO as the US started its withdrawal from the global health agency.
Trump cited the UN agency's failings during Covid close ties to China as reasons for pulling the US out of the WHO.
But a spokesperson for the CDC told DailyMail.com members from the organization 'will be actively participating virtually' at a WHO conference on flu vaccines this week.
COVID-19 mRNA Triggered Massive Loss of Trust in Routine Childhood Vaccines
Amanda Head on Just the News asked why is public confidence plummeting on routine childhood vaccines that were seemingly not an issue before the pandemic? My answer was the addition of the COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) which are synthetic mRNA or genetic material injected into developing infants and children without long-term data demonstrating safety. Additionally, there are thousands of studies raising concern over side effects in the cardiovascular, neurologic, thrombotic, and immunologic systems.
The current measles outbreak is an issue at hand. Parents who have declined the routine MMR vaccine are willing to have their families go through the five day illness rather than risk irreversible, rare side effects with the vaccine.
Two weeks to flatten the curve LIE
Back to normalcy when the majority of the vulnerable vaccinated LIE
The vaccines are our way out of this LIE
We will not cancel Christmas holidays LIE
Once everyone is vaccinated, we will get rid of this nasty virus LIE
No plans for introducing Covid passports LIE
Vaccines will not be mandated LIE
Vaccines substantially reduce transmission/infection LIE
Alternative medicines/therapies such as ivermectin do not work LIE
The PCR tests work effectively LIE
No immediate plan to vaccinate children LIE
The unvaccinated are causing the variants LIE
You will not require a vaccine to travel LIE
We will not require full vaccination a condition of entry LIE
The virus never came from a lab in wuhan LIE
We did NOT fund gain of function research LIE
Masks work LIE
We desperately need ventilators LIE
We won't be extending lockdowns LIE
The country has perfectly adequate supply of PPE LIE
We put a protective ring around care homes LIE
The government had no monetary gain/conflict of interest/racketeering incentive with emergency spending LIE
We won't be going back into another lockdown LIE
These individuals died from Covid-19, not: motorcycle accident LIE
The vaccine remains localised at the injection site LIE
Vaccines DO NOT interfere with menstrual cycles LIE
Vaccines DO NOT cause heart inflammation LIE
Vaccines are 100% safe for pregnant women LIE
Vaccines should protect us against all variants LIE
How many LIES does it take for you to wake the fuck up?
CDC Reports Disappointing Rates of Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2, Influenza, RSV
Minority of Americans Taking Shots with Loss of Trust in Public Health
The U.S. Government Secretly Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition, Killing at Least 10,000 Americans
During Prohibition (1920–1933), the federal government banned the production, sale, and transportation of alcohol under the 18th Amendment and the Volstead Act.
But Americans kept drinking, and bootleggers kept supplying.
To stop the flow, officials at the Treasury Department didn’t just increase raids or surveillance—they decided to poison the industrial alcohol supply.
Industrial alcohol was already being “denatured” with foul-tasting additives to make it undrinkable.
But in 1926, officials escalated: they ordered companies to add lethal poisons like methyl alcohol (wood alcohol), kerosene, formaldehyde, benzene, brucine, chloroform, cadmium, zinc, mercury salts, nicotine, ether, and more—up to 10% methanol in some batches.
This wasn’t done behind closed doors.
It was federal policy.
And they never told the public.
The Death Toll
Christmas Eve 1926: More than 60 people poisoned, 8 dead that night.
Following 48 hours: Another 23 died from government-poisoned alcohol.
New York City, 1926: 585 deaths.
1927: Death toll in NYC rises to 700.
Nationwide: Estimated 10,000–50,000 deaths before the policy ended.
It’s not just patients. Doctors are relying more and more on AI, too. Yesterday, FastCompany ran a story in which it reported that “two-thirds of doctors now reportedly use ChatGPT to help them home in on a diagnosis, often with good results.” In February, a new AI healthcare startup called OpenEvidence reported that 250,000 U.S. doctors were already using its product, and by mid-June the number had rocketed to 350,000.
And the AI revolution is just getting started.
The Observer’s medical experts pushed back. Patients are too stupid to use AI. “The biggest issue is that people can't ask the right questions,” said Dr. Yee. “They can't put the right things into ChatGPT.” Even worse, AI doesn’t enforce DEI. “When historical data carry biases — such as underrepresentation of certain groups or gender biases in treatment — AI systems inevitably absorb and perpetuate these biases,” complained Dr. Ted James, a Harvard medical school professor.
Laughably, the post relied —even expanding the quote into a dramatic call-out— on this main complaint: “AI did not take the Hippocratic oath,” Dr. Yee insisted. Which circles us right back to the main point.
Who squandered patient trust in doctors during the pandemic, by proving the Hippocratic ‘Oath’ is, at best, a hypocritical suggestion? Who created the environment where patients are more likely to trust their chatbots than their internists?
Doctors, that’s who.
I’d argue that, absent the healthcare profession’s awful pandemic excesses, AI would not pose anywhere near the kind of threat to doctors’ careers that it now most evidently does. Doctors nuked their own credibility, en masse. Not with a mistake. Not even a few. But with a pattern of patronizing, lockstep obedience to a failing narrative — always at the patients’ expense and their own CMS-fueled enrichment.
AI is to the medical profession as the printing press was to organized religion. It shatters the monopoly on closely guarded knowledge. It empowers the laity. It reveals just how often the robed (white-coated) gatekeepers were bluffing.
Before Gutenberg, the priesthood hoarded scripture, issuing doctrine from on high, always gatekeeping, and immune to scrutiny. After the press, their words suddenly had competition: the source material. Likewise, before AI, medical authority was treated as gospel.
Questioning your doctor was heresy — punishable by condescension or a quiet note in your permanent chart: “noncompliant.”
But ChatGPT pulls up studies your doctor hasn’t read. It explains side effects in full sentences instead of hastily scribbled warnings. It doesn’t interrupt, rush, or dismiss. It doesn’t condescend. It politely answers every question, no matter how many you ask or how dumb they are.
The real threat to medicine isn’t that AI makes mistakes. (So do doctors. A lot.) The threat is that AI demystifies the process — and proves it was never magic to begin with. It’s just pattern recognition, obscure vocabulary, hoarded data, and access to knowledge.
Everything is different now. Patients now have their own medical bibles— in English. Doctors find themselves in a deep hole to justify their value. A hole that they dug during the pandemic, which is getting deeper by the minute. They now must dig themselves out by reinventing their careers.
Johnson & Johnson Lead Scientist Confesses J&J COVID-19 Vaccine Was ‘Not Safe and Effective,’ Reveals “Lack of Research” From Rushing to Release Vaccine: “People Wanted It, We Gave It to Them”
“We didn’t do the typical tests,” said Joshua Rys, a Lead Scientist in Regulatory Affairs for Johnson & Johnson (J&J), revealed on hidden camera that the typical clinical process was abandoned for the COVID-19 vaccine, knowingly bypassing standard testing protocols under pressure from the U.S. government and public demand. He added, “This was just, ‘let’s test it on some lab models… and just throw it to the wind and see what happens.’”
He acknowledged that the public wasn’t informed about the shortcuts, asking, “Do you have any idea the lack of research that was done on those products?” Rys claimed, “People wanted it, we gave it to them.”
While public officials claimed the vaccines were “safe and effective,” Rys pushed back. “There’s no proof. None of that stuff was safe and effective,” he said, adding that the industry relies on a benefit-risk tradeoff to justify product launches.
Rys also pointed to government pressure through Operation Warp Speed. “The government is like, ‘We need help… You’re solving this problem,’” he said. “People panic, so they try to solve it in whatever way they think is good.”
« First « Previous Comments 318 - 357 of 357 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,315,080 comments by 15,568 users - Fortwaye, PeopleUnited, RC2006 online now