by PanicanDemoralizer ➕follow (10) ignore (3)
Comments 1 - 25 of 25 Search these comments
Boomers love high prices so they can benefit now at the expense of future generations.
I think the primary cause of low birth rates is the extremely high cost of a house. Of course other factors, like feminism and easy birth control, also limit the number of children that people have. But the single biggest problem is the lack of space for children where the jobs are.
And that's due largely to an institutional consensus that house prices must keep rising faster than inflation. Banks love high prices because they mean big loans. Boomers love high prices so they can benefit now at the expense of future generations. Governments love to create "solutions" which just make the problem worse, like the mortgage interest deduction and loan guarantees.
This was even a problem in the Roman Empire, as real estate in Rome became so expensive that few people could afford to have children. Augustus created bonuses and political preferences for those that had children, especially three or more children.
I think the primary cause of low birth rates is the extremely high cost of a house.
I think the primary cause of low birth rates is the extremely high cost of a house. Of course other factors, like feminism and easy birth control, also limit the number of children that people have. But the single biggest problem is the lack of space for children where the jobs are.
And that's due largely to an institutional consensus that house prices must keep rising faster than inflation. Banks love high prices because they mean big loans. Boomers love high prices so they can benefit now at the expense of future generations. Governments love to create "solutions" which just make the problem worse, like the mortgage interest deduction and loan guarantees.
This was even a problem in the Roman Empire, as real estate in Rome became so expensive that few people could afford to have children. Augustus created bonuses and political preferences for those that had children, especially three or more children.
All the fake allegations during #metoo and allegations after 30 years scared men. Unless you are high value men, women will get you for sexual assault for saying hello or making move on date.
Porno and whack may save quite a few marriages in which women think the penis is a twenty shot disposable for reproduction then abandonment rather than an ongoing need.
Tortured incels who haven't experienced the downside of entanglements and biologic engrained narcissistic women don't appreciate how free they are otherwise.
I have always been curious on how rich men decide who to merry? Wrong bitch n you lose half of your shit.
The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Texas’s age-verification law for porn sites — though this flew right under media’s radar — could be one of the most consequential developments in the battle against porn addiction in decades.
First of all, it’s a stellar legal precedent that says regulating porn is not inherently unconstitutional. Although not even close to a ban, it’s a speed-bump on the porn addiction highway. Having to verify your age with ID shatters anonymity, and that moment of indecisive friction — even just 10–15 seconds — has a profound psychological effect. It breaks the dopamine loop.
For adults, age verification adds just enough mild shame and delay to possibly reduce compulsive use. That’s probably the main reason porn producers opposed it so fiercely. They know it will cut into the bottom line.
capitalism is simple, it booms and busts.
we removed busts by printing away. so shit stays in business and asset prices inflate. government that ends up making rich richer, screws the rest.
it’s a bad system right now.
Psst!
Over here...
https://patrick.net/comment?comment_id=2186509
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,315,087 comments by 15,568 users - Fortwaye, goofus, MolotovCocktail, Patrick, PeopleUnited online now