patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,315,032 comments by 15,568 users - askmeaboutthesaltporkcure, Patrick online now
invite responseComments 1 - 6 of 6 Search these comments
1
PanicanDemoralizer
2025 Jul 14, 1:44pm
PanicanDemoralizer
2025 Jul 14, 1:44pm
(The problem with this theory is pushing abortion, experimental injections, etc. by the Woke)
3
PanicanDemoralizer
2025 Jul 14, 2:12pm
PanicanDemoralizer
2025 Jul 14, 2:12pm
Patrick says
Yeah, watching now. He's addressing that around the 14 minute mark, bringing up my "Demoralization warning" point which y'all are probably sick of.
Those with are resistant to dysgenic, demoralizing pressure will have kids ANYWAY despite the Woke Bombardment, thus improving the future stock once those more susceptible to dooming die off. They will accept housing below the quality they grew up in and breed anyway as they are less materialistic AND less susceptible to dooming.
Furthermore, Wokies bring down and impoverish the civilization they depend on, speeding their elimination.
They're trying to kill the rest of us too.
Yeah, watching now. He's addressing that around the 14 minute mark, bringing up my "Demoralization warning" point which y'all are probably sick of.
Those with are resistant to dysgenic, demoralizing pressure will have kids ANYWAY despite the Woke Bombardment, thus improving the future stock once those more susceptible to dooming die off. They will accept housing below the quality they grew up in and breed anyway as they are less materialistic AND less susceptible to dooming.
Furthermore, Wokies bring down and impoverish the civilization they depend on, speeding their elimination.
4
Fortwaye
2025 Jul 14, 2:14pm
behind all of it there’s always some group of assholes profiting.
it became obvious when Obama started advertising for hormone industry.
it became obvious when Obama started advertising for hormone industry.
6
Ceffer
2025 Jul 14, 3:50pm
Ceffer
2025 Jul 14, 3:50pm
Too simplistic. The stochastic processes of genetic selection are too complicated to aver that mere philosophical memed 'negative' tendencies can be separated from positive social survival strategies such as altruism, unified action, communication and social consciousness. Also, 'negative' tendencies from the point of editorial view of individuals or groups are mere opinions in the eye of nature. They may swap back and forth depending on which selfish genes try to predominate.
You would have to state that the spread spectrum of traits allowing wayward altruism and manipulation would automatically not be re-birthed in the next generation, even amongst conservatives. Inter-generational rebellions agains 'status quo' seem to increase diversity, which is the palette of standard hypothesized evolution. You may have short term genetic dilutions that have no meaning over longer periods of time.
Standard model Darwinian evolution may be wrong because evolution also can take place through Monarch type 'inherited' memory (outside the mechanical assumptions that DNA structure is entirely determinative) as well as electromagnetic harmonic entanglements (where the 'information' of life may be contained in a parallel energized dimension rather than in a molecular structure in and of itself aka DNA as a life antenna, not life itself).
You would have to state that the spread spectrum of traits allowing wayward altruism and manipulation would automatically not be re-birthed in the next generation, even amongst conservatives. Inter-generational rebellions agains 'status quo' seem to increase diversity, which is the palette of standard hypothesized evolution. You may have short term genetic dilutions that have no meaning over longer periods of time.
Standard model Darwinian evolution may be wrong because evolution also can take place through Monarch type 'inherited' memory (outside the mechanical assumptions that DNA structure is entirely determinative) as well as electromagnetic harmonic entanglements (where the 'information' of life may be contained in a parallel energized dimension rather than in a molecular structure in and of itself aka DNA as a life antenna, not life itself).
@jollyheretic
What if Wokeness isn’t just a sign of cultural collapse—but an evolutionary mechanism?
In Woke Eugenics, we argue that what’s called “Woke” ideology—social justice, antiracism, transgenderism, radical feminism—isn’t simply madness. It’s a deeply Darwinian process. Beneath the surface, Wokeness functions as a form of unconscious negative selection. It disproportionately appeals to the genetically maladaptive: the low in intelligence, the highly neurotic, the physically unhealthy, the narcissistic, and the mentally disordered. And crucially—it encourages them to sterilise themselves.
Through childlessness, gender confusion, “body positivity,” antinatalism, casual sex, and identity-based victimhood, Wokeness seduces the most evolutionarily vulnerable segments of the population into ideological self-destruction. They don’t reproduce. They don’t build families. They often don’t survive.
Meanwhile, those immune to Wokeness—often traditional, religious, future-oriented, group-loyal individuals—are more likely to be genetically and psychologically healthy. They are the ones who marry, have children, and pass on their values. Wokeness, then, polarises society and accelerates the selective removal of its weakest links.
You might hate Wokeness. You might see it as chaos. But what if that chaos is how nature does her housekeeping?
This is not a collapse. It’s a filter.
J.O.A. Rayner-Hilles and I lay out this thesis in detail in Woke Eugenics, and in the lecture linked below. If you’re willing to think evolutionarily—and ruthlessly—you may never see the modern world the same way again.
Watch it.👇
https://x.com/jollyheretic/status/1944745628954742810
(EDIT: ~20 minute presentation at the link)