Comments 1 - 27 of 27 Search these comments
The agreement, announced jointly by Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), will almost surely face vehement opposition from far-right House Republicans, who had hoped to force steep budget cuts.
Breaking it down, the deal sets aside $886.3 billion for defense spending, $772.7 billion in domestic discretionary spending, and rescinds $6.1 billion in coronavirus emergency spending authority. The deal also accelerates $20 billion in cuts from the $80 billion IRS funding allocated under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
According to a Sunday "Dear Colleague" letter, the topline deal - which mostly adheres to a deal reached between the White House and former speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), limits discretionary spending to $1.66 trillion overall. It also secures $16 billion in additional spending cuts vs. the McCarthy deal, and is around $30 billion less than what Senate Democrats wanted.
...
"This represents the most favorable budget agreement Republicans have achieved in over a decade," wrote Johnson,
The best deal in a decade by Republicans is a bar so high
AmericanKulak says
The best deal in a decade by Republicans is a bar so high
Look at how they are reducing spending increases. The Republicans have a budget that is less than $30 billion than the Senate Democrats requested.
The Republicans are at least growing the budget below the inflation rate. This is still a victory as far as at least controlling spending.
The deficit is SKYROCKETING ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Otherwise once they sell the debt to a debt collector it's over. The creditor has been paid
Back from 2009 to 2017 there were complaints of how US Treasuries were providing a real return of no more than 0%. Certificate of Deposits were paying shit also.
The low interest environment helped the federal government to avoid a debt crisis as the debt to GDP ratio increased from around 60% to 107% during Obama's terms. Back then annual inflation averaged less than 2%.
Now it is around 120% and it seems with higher inflation that the government is inflating out of a debt crisis.
We'll see how debt to GDP ratio fares by this late summer.
Yesterday, CNN ran a story headlined, “Trump budget proposes $1 trillion for defense, slashes education, foreign aid, environment, health and public assistance.” Democrats were, predictably, outraged.
“Budget” —a word evoking fiscal restraint— has always been a strange term to describe what are really federal spending plans. And the President’s budget is even odder, since Congress actually drafts the annual spending plan. So President Trump’s “budget” is more of a suggestion or recommendation, a description of presidential priorities for areas to spend money on or to cut.
In reality, it described how to make much of Trump’s first 100 days’ progress permanent.
This budget blueprint would increase defense and border budgets, fund MAHA, preserve Social Security and Medicare, and suggest permanent cuts to various agencies the Trump team has already targeted for destruction. It would cut the State Department’s foreign aid budget by an eye-watering -84%, slash Biden’s green energy programs, like his failed $40B electric charger network, wither National Science Foundation spending by -56%, eliminate four entire NIH departments (for minority health, nursing research, global health and integrative health, whatever that is), and memory-hole more than a dozen smaller agencies, some of which the administration is already busily dismantling.
If Congress complies, the ashcanned agencies would include crowd favorites like: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (NPR/PBS), AmeriCorps, the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the ‘400 Years of African American History Commission,’ the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, the Job Corps, and the US Institute of Peace.
In addition to ensuring DOGE cuts are made permanent, the cuts are also intended to offset an extension of the GOP’s 2017 tax cuts, and fulfill several of Trump’s tax-related campaign promises, like ending taxes on tips and Social Security payments— which would immediately increase payments to people receiving Social Security.
We will end up like Greece!
No tax on tips and that immediate increase in Social Security payments would be brilliant moves politically.
Patrick says
No tax on tips and that immediate increase in Social Security payments would be brilliant moves politically.
Most people are afraid of credit and don't use the points game. Tips are 80% cash and no one claims them anyway. So it's not a big savings for most. I think it's a good thing, but not a huge game changer.
WookieMan says
Patrick says
No tax on tips and that immediate increase in Social Security payments would be brilliant moves politically.
Most people are afraid of credit and don't use the points game. Tips are 80% cash and no one claims them anyway. So it's not a big savings for most. I think it's a good thing, but not a huge game changer.
That is not the case in a lot of establishments in Panama City Beach like Back Beach Barbecue. They collect the tips and distribute them among the workers.
And a large majority of tips in Panama City Beach are by credit card.
.
And a large majority of tips in Panama City Beach are by credit card.
Even if the tips are cash, not everyone is a crook and actually do report them.
https://www.cato.org/blog/fast-facts-about-discretionary-spending
In 2024 the discretionary budget is $1.66 trillion according to the below link. So that is an improvement credited to Speaker Johnson with his negotiations with the Democrats.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/01/07/congress-budget-deal/