7
0

Remdesivir Is A Poison


 invite response                  
2024 Jul 27, 2:41pm   748 views  24 comments

by The_Deplorable   ➕follow (1)   ignore (0)  

The COVID Drug Remdesivir is a Mass Killer! According to Dr. Bryan Ardis - Remdesivir kills 30% of the patients receiving it.



See "Official U.S. Data Proves COVID Drug Remdesivir is Mass Killer!" https://principia-scientific.com/official-u-s-data-proves-covid-drug-remdesivir-is-mass-killer/

Data show that about one third of all patients treated with the anti-COVID drug, Remdesivir die. Dr Bryan Ardis cited official data from the government of New York State to prove what he and others predicted: Big Pharma and corrupt government is killing us.

Comments 1 - 24 of 24        Search these comments

1   The_Deplorable   2024 Jul 27, 2:49pm  

We learned that Remdesivir is a poison in May 2020 when The Lancet reported that Remdesivir performed worse than a placebo! And this is the very definition of a poison. In other words you are better off not taking Remdesivir.

"Findings... Adverse events were reported in 102 (66%) of 155 Remdesivir recipients... Remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients...." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31022-9/fulltext
2   Ceffer   2024 Jul 27, 7:57pm  

Fauci smiles.
3   komputodo   2024 Jul 27, 9:16pm  

fuck around with remdesivir and find out
4   Al_Sharpton_for_President   2024 Jul 28, 7:12am  

Well, thank you very much. And welcome to Dan O'Day, CEO of Gilead. You know what that is because it's been in the news and the company has been in the news, and it's a great American company that's done incredible work on HIV and hepatitis C. And I hear that - that's what's happening with hepatitis is the great - a great medical story. Really, a great medical story. I've been hearing about that. It's fantastic, Dan

I'm pleased to announce that Gilead now has an EUA from the FDA for remdesivir. And you know what that is because that's been the hot thing also in the papers and in the media for the last little while. An important treatment for hospitalized coronavirus patients. And it's something - I spoke with Dr. Hahn and Dr. Fauci; I spoke with Deborah about it. And it's - it's really a very promising situation.

We've been doing work with the teams at the FDA, NIH, and Gilead for spearheading this public-private partnership to make this happen very quickly.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?471735-1%2Fpresident-trump-oval-office-remarks-remdesivir=
5   RayAmerica   2024 Jul 28, 7:36am  

Just a reminder: how did the RNs mockingly refer to Remdesivir?

"RemDeathIsNear"
6   GNL   2024 Jul 28, 10:24am  

RayAmerica says

Just a reminder: how did the RNs mockingly refer to Remdesivir?

"RemDeathIsNear"

RunDeathIsNear
7   The_Deplorable   2024 Jul 28, 12:04pm  

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

" https://www.c-span.org/video/?471735-1%2Fpresident-trump-oval-office-remarks-remdesivir= "

According to President Trump, "I'm pleased to announce that Gilead now has an Emergency Use
Authorization from the FDA for Remdesivir."


The FDA (Fauci) had no business issuing an Emergency Use Authorization to Gilead for Remdesivir because
at the time we had two antiviral (and antiparasitic) medications that cure Covid: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)
and Ivermectin
- two very safe and effective medications. In contrast, there is no proof that Remdesivir was
safe and effective!

Ivermectin and HCQ cost pennies to eradicate the Covid virus from the human body in less than a week
while Remdesivir, which is toxic and deadly, costs $3,000 a week.

Note that Anthony Fauci knew in 2005 that HCQ is an antiviral medication that kills the Corona virus
and this in connection with the 2003 SARS outbreak that was caused by the Corona virus SARS-CoV.
8   Al_Sharpton_for_President   2024 Jul 28, 1:18pm  

The_Deplorable says

Ivermectin and HCQ cost pennies to eradicate the Covid virus from the human body

I see the problem there….
9   komputodo   2024 Jul 28, 1:52pm  

Is it logical to expect that the president of the usa should also be an expert on medicine and disease? That he should not take the word of specialists in the field of medicine and be able to debate the fine points of medicine with the so called PHDs? Just askin...
10   Patrick   2024 Jul 30, 10:27am  

He should be aware of the extreme corruption in the pharmaceutical industry.
11   Onvacation   2024 Aug 17, 10:33am  

Why would they keep pushing poison?
12   Patrick   2024 Oct 2, 7:13pm  

https://dee746.substack.com/p/covid-things-i-remember





I remember thinking, how do they know it wasn’t the new med that killed her…? I had heard there was an experimental treatment being given. The drug was called Remdesivir and I had already looked it up.

I remembered the word Cytotoxic.

This was at the “beginning”, when shots were being given and the patients came in with flu-like symptoms. The patient had refused the jab but caught Covid from the jabbed. Her death was blamed on Covid.

THAT WAS SO MESSED UP!
13   PanicanDemoralizer   2024 Oct 2, 7:34pm  

Glass, my ass

15   Ceffer   2024 Oct 2, 10:16pm  

FDA: "Remdesivir? What's that? Never heard of it."
17   Ceffer   2024 Oct 24, 9:57am  

Remdeceiver. It's written in the title. Something that deceives as a remedy. They mock us with their poisons pretending to be cures and balms.
18   Patrick   2025 Jan 28, 1:49pm  

https://palexander.substack.com/p/wang-et-al-and-remdesivir-did-wangs-cd8


Adverse events were reported in 102 (66%) of 155 remdesivir recipients versus 50 (64%) of 78 placebo recipients. Remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early. ...

In this study of adult patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits.’


So remdesivir causes harm without any benefits.
20   Patrick   2025 Apr 24, 12:08pm  

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/205385.html


"Nadia [sic] talks with about her husband's death on Remdesivir"
Cafe Locked Out Podcast, Feb 13, 2023

https://cafelockeddown.substack.com/p/warning-shocking-nadia-talks-with

NADA KOVACEVIC: OK. On the 20th of September 2021 I found my husband not well, so I called the ambulance. He had very high blood sugar and the ambulance suspected it was sepsis from the high blood sugar. They were with him for about 45 minutes, and then they took him to Queanbeyan Hospital, which 3 minutes away. I was in Batemans Bay caring for my 85 year-old father, so I had driven that morning from Bateman's Bay to Frank and I asked them to take him to Batemans Bay's Hospital, it's not they didn't want to, nearest hospital.

I was a bit scared of hospitals because of what I heard internationally what was going on. And so my husband arrived at Queanbeyan District Hospital at 10:33 AM and I spent that day calling Canberra Hospital and Queanbeyan Hospital ten times trying to find the whereabouts of my husband. Queanbeyan Hospital told me, I called them within 15 minutes, and they told me, no, he's going to be sent straight to Canberra Hospital because it's a bigger hospital and it's got more facilities and wait half an hour and call Canberra Hospital. So I did that, I waited half an hour, called Canberra Hospital and they said, no, he hasn't arrived yet, you know, call back in an hour. So I called in an hour and he hadn't arrived. And I called Queanbeyan and they'd say, no, no, he's definitely gone. I'd call, I spent the entire day doing this, calling both hospitals while they were telling me he was in transit or he's on his way, and then finally I found out that at 4:30, so that's about 6 hours later, I found out that he arrived in Canberra Hospital and the ICU staff, the staff that answered at the emergency department said, oh yes, Frank's finally arrived and he's intubated and he's on his way to ICU. So that was the first that I heard that he was intubated on, and put on a ventilator, despite the fact that I had called the hospital.

I subsequently, that day, so that was the 20th of September, that day, I later found out through his medical records that he was put on the remdesivir protocol, so straight on admission.

And that's, you know, doctors finish up at, you know, 4:30 in the afternoon, you know, so to actually start the protocol, they were in such a hurry to get him onto remdesivir that night, his hospital records show that the remdesivir wasn't even recorded on the day it was administered. It was recorded on the 28th of September. So after the round of remsedivir was actually completed, I believe the round is about about 5 days, and so they recorded it on the 28th that they gave it to him on the 20th.

And a doctor— so I had called the Canberra Hospital at 6:37 PM, it's all on my phone records, and even though I had called the hospital that late at night they didn't inform me or seek my consent of whether it was agreeable to me put what is, according to dictionary definitions a poison in my husbands's arm because it has a 53.1% death rate.

Now I knew about remdesivir because I had stumbled across a FaceBook podcast, and it was a bit of a documentary on vaccinations and drugs and poisons and remdesivir featured in that. So I knew the name, I knew the word, I knew it was toxic, so if doctors had asked me, do you want to give your husband remdesivir, it would been an absolute no. But I wasn't given any choice in his treatments. In fact I was locked out.

That's when during the period where the government was pushing its 80% drive, the hospitals were locked out to family and friends. I was told that I wasn't to approach the hospital of Canberra because in Canberra was shut out and I was in New South Wales technically in Queanbeyan and Bateman's Bay.

So the hospital kept my husband on a protocol of paralyzing drugs, fentanyl, which is a very strong manmade synthetic opiod. And on just drugs, he's got 57 pages of drugs that they kept him sedated, intubated, and paralyzed for 18 days and just watched him as he died.
21   Patrick   2025 Apr 25, 11:21pm  

https://iceni.substack.com/p/declaration-of-sovereignty-pt-i


Initially developed for Ebola, remdesivir:

Failed its initial trials
Showed limited or no efficacy in early viral clearance
Carried known risks of:

Renal toxicity
Liver inflammation
Systemic hypotension

Despite this:

It was rapidly blessed by NIAID, with Fauci declaring it the “new standard of care”
Hospitals were financially incentivized to administer it
Cheaper, repurposed treatments were smeared, blacklisted, or excluded from trials

Why?

Because Gilead:

Had exclusive licensing
Had pre-purchased supply deals with the U.S. and other nations
Had deep ties to NIH and HHS actors (including royalties tied to development)

The poison was already paid for.

It had to be used, regardless of result.

Patients died on ventilators with their kidneys failing.
But Gilead’s quarterly report improved.
22   Maga_Chaos_Monkey   2025 Apr 26, 12:59pm  

Patrick says

But Gilead’s quarterly report improved.


When pharma buys the biotech I work at I always quit and go somewhere else - since the 90s.

Gilead is a blurry line. I consider them big pharma and would never work for them but I've had some neighbors who did.
24   Patrick   2025 Jun 17, 11:18am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/weather-or-not-tuesday-june-17-2025


Sarepta Therapeutics of Boston, Mass., lost 40% of its stock value yesterday, after it disclosed a second death among its pediatric patients treated for muscular dystrophy with its gene-editing drug Elevidys. Both deaths were from liver failure. Remember iatrogenic liver failure? That is exactly what killed hundreds or thousands who were given Remdesivir by hospitals during the pandemic, often against their will, and whether they wanted it or not. Science! Shut up!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste