patrick.net

新冠疫苗注射可以以超过100项研究的17种不同方式诱导癌症！ 附记者综述

Attached to the reporter's summary

🚨COVID mRNA shots may induce cancer in 17 distinct ways based on over 100 studies! Attached to the reporter's summary

SONIA ELIJAH
JUN 28

Reporter's summary: Case 1 A woman suffered from pulmonary embolism after injecting two Pfizer vaccines, with respiratory distress, decreased blood oxygen and hospitalization. After being discharged from the hospital, the reporter went to visit her home and learned that she took out a small yellow medicine box and the doctor arranged to take a Pfizer antithrombotic drug. It is said that the effect is quite good! Case 2 A man suffered from pancreatic cancer metastasized liver cancer with a dose of COVID-19 vaccine. The doctor cared for the patient to take Moderna anti-cancer drugs, which was said to be expensive... When the new coronavirus 🦠New Coronavirus vaccine💉Mainstream pharmaceutical factories💊Corrupt media🗞️Corrupt officials👮‍♀️, forming a black community of interests, and few people escape the deliberate layout disaster. / French Free Health Human Rights Reporter: Han Rongli

记者综述：案例1某女，注射两针辉瑞疫苗后罹患肺栓塞，呼吸窘迫、血氧降低、住院治疗，出院后记者去家里访问获悉，她拿出一个小黄药盒，医生安排服用一种辉瑞抗血栓药物，据说效果还可以！案例2某男，一针新冠疫苗罹患胰腺癌转移肝癌，医生关怀患者服用莫德纳(Moderna)抗癌药物，据说价格不菲…。当新冠病毒🦠新冠疫苗💉主流药厂💊腐败媒体🗞️贪腐官员👮‍♀️，形成一个黑色利益共同体，极少人躲过蓄意的布局劫难。/ 法国自由健康人权记者：韩荣利

https://open.substack.com/pub/soniaelijah/p/covid-mrna-shots-may-induce-cancer

READ IN APP

yellow and black abstract painting
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash
A shocking report written by Mathilde Debord, first published in Lepointcritique.fr claims that mRNA COVID-19 shots may contribute to cancer development in 17 ways- based on over 100 studies.

Key points include:

Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid
Genome Instability: Vaccine mRNA may integrate into the host genome, causing mutations that could lead to cancer, as suggested by studies from 2021-2023.
Immune Escape: The spike protein may inhibit tumor suppressor genes (e.g., p53, BRCA1/2), allowing cancer cells to evade immune detection.
DNA Repair Disruption: The spike protein impairs DNA repair mechanisms, increasing cancer risk.
Chronic Inflammation: Lipid nanoparticles in vaccines trigger inflammation, potentially fostering cancer stem cell growth.
Immune Dysregulation: mRNA vaccines suppress T cells and interferon responses, weakening cancer surveillance.
RNA Disruption: Modified mRNA disrupts microRNAs, affecting cell proliferation and tumor suppression.
Oncogenic Pathways: The spike protein activates pathways (e.g., MAPK, PI3K/AKT) linked to tumor growth.
Tumor Microenvironment: Lipid nanoparticles enhance cancer cell spread via the EPR effect, potentially causing “turbo cancer.”
Dormant Cancer Awakening: Vaccine-induced inflammation may reactivate dormant cancers, leading to aggressive relapses.
Immune Monitoring Alteration: Modified mRNA blocks immune receptors, making tumor cells less detectable.
Frameshift Mutations: mRNA translation errors produce aberrant proteins, posing safety risks.
Multiple Injections: Repeated doses may exhaust the immune system, increasing cancer susceptibility.
DNA Contamination: Vaccines contain plasmid DNA, potentially integrating into the genome and raising cancer risk.
SV40 Oncogene Sequences: Pfizer vaccines include SV40 sequences, known to promote cancer in animal studies.
Renin-Angiotensin System Disruption: Spike protein overactivates AT1R, promoting tumor proliferation.
Microbiota Damage: Vaccines reduce bifidobacteria, linked to cancer regulation.
Treatment Resistance: Spike protein may enhance cancer cell survival post-chemotherapy.
Debord importantly states how many in the scientific community warned more than four years ago about the cancer risks associated with COVID mRNA injections. She then proceeds to present evidence from the scientific literature how these shots have the ability to induce, accelerate or “wake up” cancers in 17 different ways.

The English translation of the article can be read below.

Is mass vaccination against COVID in the case of an explosion of cancer cases, as many scientists claim, some of whom had prophesied as early as May 2021? Two years ago, a group of French oncologists published a forum in which they categorically refute this hypothesis: “To date, no alert link has been published between an increased incidence or risk of rapid cancer progression after vaccination-car-COVID-19 or after another vaccination. They now claim to be facing a tsunami of dazzling cancers, especially among young people, to whom they say they find no rational explanation:

We have a staggering increase in pancreatic cancer without any idea of reason. Did something happen? We don't know. The whole world, all the world, is the question. The system that allows us to understand cancer is being misunderstood.

Prof. Khayat, co-founder of the InCA

If Professor Khayat is consistent, he cannot theoretically rule out that vaccination can be at the origin of this explosion of cancer cases since it is (1) extremely recent if reference is made to his previous interventions, (2) it affects the whole planet – in particular those who have been forced to inject themselves into a social life or who have aggressively promoted vaccination (the influencers in particular) – and (3) it seems to be responding to an alternative. As would a substance used for the first time in humans, only part of the composition of which is known and whose impact on cancer has not been assessed before its massive deployment.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Huscher last March identified 10 ways in which anti-COVID RNA injections can cause cancer. This list, which was taken from a study [2]published in December 2023 in the journal Cureus, can now be extended to 17 items on the (non-exhaustive) basis of more than 100 studies.

1. Genome instability

The risk of integrating vaccine RNA into the genome of vaccinated individuals was confirmed in 2021 by a series of studies[3],[4],[5]. DNA-induced insertional mutagenesis causes frameshift mutations that induce the production of aberrant proteins leading to cancer.

The European Medicines Agency still claims that the vaccine mRNA cannot penetrate the nucleus of the cells, this integration requiring the use of an enzyme (reverse transcriptase) which, in its view, is absent from human cells. However, this assertion, which is not based on any evidence, was reversed in June 2021. This phenomenon was observed in July 2023 in mice, where a single injection of mRNA led to genetic modification. More recently, vaccine spike protein has been found in tumors of vaccinated patients[7], suggesting that it can be integrated into the genome, the first feared consequence of such integration being the development of cancer.

This hypothesis was revived in mid-April by scientists from a biomolecular research laboratory (Neo7Bioscience) and researchers from the University of North Texas. The molecular data they collected suggest that the RNA derived from the vaccine could be retro-transcriminated in the host genome, permanently altering gene regulation. They also reveal carcinogenic signs and immune collapse.

2. Immune Escape

The Spike protein (S2) inhibits several tumour suppressor genes (p53, BRCA1/2, RB1)[9,[10,[10, 11, , bind to, allowing cancer cells to escape their detection and destruction by the immune system. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher speaks of an "oncogene reversal".

The first study demonstrating this interference of the Spike protein with the p53 protein, also called the “genome guardian”, was published in October 2021 [12]by Jiang et al. The study was retracted in May 2022 by order of the NIH of Anthony Fauci. A request to publish e-mail exchanges concerning this retraction has been made under the Access to Information Act, but the NIH still refuses to communicate the 490 pages of communications. These results were confirmed in vitro by zhang and El Deiry [13]in 2024 and one month later in vivo.

3. 3. Mechanism for repairing altered DNA

The vaccine Spike protein induces genomic alterations and inhibits the DNA repair system (Jiang, zhang and El Deiry). This mechanism normally takes place in the event of an attack by the body, to prevent mutations that may promote the onset of cancer, repair errors affecting oncogenes or tumour-suppressing genes. [15]Its alteration induces immunodeficiency which is “a direct route to cancer”.

The strategic sequence of the Spike protein patented in 2016 by Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel would target a gene (MSH3)[16, which alters a DNA repair deficit[17]. The pathways by which the Spike protein inhibits this mechanism are listed in the article by Baiaran et al.[18, published last April.

4. Chronic inflammation

The lipid nanoparticles [19],[20]used for the transport of vaccine mRNA induce massive secretion of inflammatory proteins[21, 22, 23, 24, (cytokine storm), paving the way for the emergence of cancer stem cells. These cells are likely to grow throughout the organs (including blood stem cells[25) taking into account the generalised biodistribution of the Spike protein[26,[27, the pathogenicity of which is described in detail in three literature reviews[28, 29[30], 30 and more than 320 studies. This inflammation can result in depletion of T cells, which are then no longer able to remove cancer cells.

The Grok AI confirms that the injections are causing acute inflammation, but which would be solved within a few days (Bergamaschi, Ogata) and which would be comparable to that of other vaccines. He said that chronic inflammation required prolonged stimulation, while "programming spike production is limited in time (mRNA is degraded within a few days, Spike within a few weeks), making chronic inflammation unlikely." This claim is contradicted by a series of studies[31], including four recent studies where the Spike protein was found in blood plasma up to 709 days after an injection [32](245 days[33, or 12 months [34]according to other studies), and up to 17 months [35]in the tissues and organs of Japanese patients, especially the brain. More than four years after the first injections, no one actually knows if the body stops producing it.

5. Immune system dysregulation

MRNA vaccination results in suppression of T cells (lymphopénie)[36) and responses to interferon type I[37], which plays a crucial role in the surveillance and proliferation of cancer. These changes lead to impaired innate immunity[38,[39,[40,[41, and reprogramming of the adaptive immune response[42,[43, 43, . Deregulation of the immune system in the central nervous system has also been reported[44].

In the context of COVID-19 vaccination, this inhibition ensures appropriate synthesis of advanced proteins and reduced immune activation. There is evidence that the 100% addition of N1-methyl-pseudourdin (m1-) to mRNA vaccine in a model of mlanome stimulated cancer growth and metastases, while vaccines without mRNA modification were not induced by opposite results, suggesting that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could help the development of the cancer.

Rubio-Casillas et al. Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1'): Friend or foe of cancer? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131427.

Grok cites a 2020 study[45], carried out by Ugur Sahin, CEO of BioNTech, which argues that mRNA vaccines induce robust responses of persistent CD4- and CD8-T cells, detected in the first days post-vaccination, which would contradict the idea of general and long-lasting immunosuppression. On the contrary, Pfizer’s own clinical data demonstrate a decrease in T cells from 6 to 8 days after vaccination in 45% to 46% of the participants, it is known to have worsened over time.

6. RNA disruption

Vaccine mRNA is a modified mRNA for the purpose of increasing its longevity and production. The technique used by Pfizer and Moderna (codon optimization) disrupts microRNAs, which are key players in cell proliferation and death, including cancer cells[47],[48]. A study showed in 2021 [49]that the vaccine Spike protein is transported into microRNA-containing vesicles (exosomes) that will prevent interferon function and thus inhibit natural immunity, disrupting cellular processes such as tumour proliferation or monitoring.

7. Activation of oncogenic pathways

The Spike protein is suspected of indirectly activating several pathways that play a crucial role in tumour growth, proliferation and cell survival (MAPK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR[50,[51, 52), and to increase the level of interleukin 6 (IL-6), a proinflammatory marker involved in immunity, inflammation, tumour growth, progression of metametasures or resistance to immunotherapy. Its chronic elevation is associated with inflammation that can promote cancer in certain settings.

Grok again states that no formal studies link these disturbances to cancer, but a recent study [53]has re-tread metabolic evidence of activation of certain oncogenic pathways, including the PI3K/mTOR pathway in patients who developed leukaemia in weeks following a second or third Pfizer injection.

8. Tumor microenvironment

Lipid nanoparticles (NPLs) accumulate in tissues via the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect, which is characterised by increased permeability of tumour blood vessels and prolonged retention of nanoparticles in tumour tissue. NPLs thus cause a more rapid spread of cancer cells[54][55] , which may explain the phenomenon of “turbo cancer” described by pathologists and oncologists and observed in a study in mice[56]. Is such an acceleration of a pathogenic process valid for other Spike-induced diseases? Swedish researchers demonstrated in 2023 that the Spike protein could not only induce Alzheimer’s disease but reduce the disease incubation time by 80%[57], causing a new form of “turbo Alzheimer’s disease”.

9. Awakening of dormant cancers

Changes in the tumour microenvironment by COVID-19-associated inflammation or vaccination may affect cancer waking up and metastatic relapse.

Patients who had no cancer for many years suddenly relapsed with aggressive and explosive cancers soon after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. These cases show very rapid tumour growth after booster administration. These turbo cancers appear faster and with a more virulence than we expected in patients, even those who had been stable for years. Public health authorities are reluctant to acknowledge this correlation. This phenomenon occurs throughout the world where mRNA vaccines have been administered.

Prof. Ian Brighthope. The big debate: Port Hedland against the Prime Minister. 29 Nov. 2024

The ability of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein to fuse multiple cells[60][61][,[60,[61, explain the cascade of COVID-19 complications, including cancer. The formation of syncytia resulting from this fusion could indeed contribute to the development or progression of cancer, in particular in the case of pre-existing lesions, but also to the formation of metastases and to the cancer recounter, according to former Yale University professor Yuri Lazebni[62].

Precision, ivermectin, whose efficacy against COVID-19 is confirmed to date by more than 100 studies, has many antitumour effects[63) (inhibition of tumour stem cells, proliferation, metastases and angiogenic activity, accelerated programmed death of cancer cells, inversion of multidrug resistance), including its ability to inhibit the formation of syncytia induced by spike[64]. Ivermectin, nobelinated in 2006, has an exceptional level of safety, including in children and pregnant women, making it an essential molecule according to the WHO. Why was it not allowed when the efficacy, safety and carcinogenic potential of mRNA injections were not known? The question should sooner or later be asked.

10. Alteration of immune monitoring

Modified mRNA makes tumour cells “invisible” by blocking activation of the immune system’s first-line receptors (Toll receptors, or TLR).

Karik and Weissman, the two researchers behind Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, explained in 2005 🚨covidmRNA
刺戳新冠疫苗注射可以以超过100项研究的17种不同方式诱导癌症！ Sonia Elijah 6月28日在App中阅读黄色和黑色抽象绘画照片由国家癌症研究所未提出一份由Mathinde Debord撰写的令人震惊的报告，首次发表于Lepointcritique.fr声明MRNA Covid-19射击可能会在17种方式促进癌症发展 关键点包括：Sonia Elijah调查是一个读者支持的出版物。 要接收新员额并支持我的工作，考虑成为一个免费或支付的订户。 升级到支付基因组不稳定性：疫苗mRNA可以整合到宿主基因组中，导致可能导致癌症的突变，如：2021～2023的研究所提出的。 免疫逃生：尖峰蛋白可以抑制肿瘤抑制基因（例如，P53，BRCA1 / 2），允许癌细胞逃避免疫检测。 DNA修复破坏：穗蛋白损害DNA修复机制，增加癌症风险。 慢性炎症：脂质纳米粒子在疫苗中引发炎症，可能培养癌症干细胞生长。 免疫失调：mRNA疫苗抑制T细胞和干扰素反应，削弱癌症监测。 RNA破坏：修饰的mRNA破坏MicroRNA，影响细胞增殖和肿瘤抑制。 致癌途径：穗蛋白激活与肿瘤生长相关的途径（例如，MAPK，PI3K / AKT）。 肿瘤微环境：脂质纳米颗粒通过EPR效应增强癌细胞，可能导致“涡轮癌” 休眠癌症觉醒：疫苗诱导的炎症可重新激活休眠癌症，导致侵略性复发。 免疫监测改变：改性mRNA阻断免疫受体，使肿瘤细胞较少可检测。 框架突变：mRNA翻译误差产生异常蛋白质，构成安全风险。 多次注射：重复剂量可以耗尽免疫系统，增加癌症易感性。 DNA污染：疫苗含有质粒DNA，可能与基因组含有并提高癌症风险。 SV40癌基因序列：辉瑞疫苗包括SV40序列，已知促进动物研究中的癌症。 肾素 - 血管紧张素系统破坏：尖峰蛋白质在1R中过度激活，促进肿瘤增殖。 Microbiota损伤：疫苗减少双歧杆菌，与癌症调节相关联。 治疗抗性：穗蛋白质可以增强化疗后癌细胞存活。 脱德大致说明科学界中有多少人在四年多之前警告了与Covid mRNA注射相关的癌症风险。 然后，她继续提供科学文献的证据，这些镜头如何具有17种不同方式诱导，加速或“唤醒”癌症的能力。 文章的英文翻译可以阅读下面。 在癌症病例爆炸的情况下，对Covid的大规模疫苗接种，因为许多科学家声称，其中一些人早于2021年5月早期就预言？ 两年前，一群法国肿瘤学家出版了一个论坛，其中他们分类地反驳了这一假设：“迄今为止，在接种疫苗 - Car-Covid-19或疫苗接种后的疫苗接种后快速癌症进展的发病率或风险之间没有发表警报链接。 他们现在声称面临着令人眼花缭乱的癌症的海啸，特别是在年轻人中，他们认为他们发现没有理性的解释：我们在没有任何理念的情况下患上胰腺癌的惊人增加。 有点发生了吗？ 我们不知道。 全世界，全世界都是问题。 允许我们理解癌症的系统被误解。 INCA的联合创始人Khayat教授，如果Khayat教授一致，他无法理解排除疫苗接种可以处于癌症病例的这种爆炸的起源，因为它是（1）近期如果对他之前的干预措施进行了最近（1），则（ 对于在人类中第一次使用的物质，只有部分组合物是已知的，并且在大规模部署之前尚未评估其对癌症的影响。 流行病学生尼古拉斯壳果去3月确定了10种方法，其中抗Covid RNA注射会导致癌症。 此列表是从学习中获取的[2]发表于2023年12月在Cureus期刊上，现在可以扩展到17项（非详尽措施）的100多项研究。 1.通过一系列研究[3]，[4]，[5]，在2021年证实了基因组不稳定性将疫苗RNA集成到接种疫苗的疫苗中基因组中的风险[3]，[4]，[5]。 DNA诱导的插入诱变引起诱导诱导异常蛋白质导致癌症的异常蛋白的突变突变。 欧洲药物署仍然要求疫苗mRNA不能穿透细胞的细胞核，这种结合需要使用酶（逆转录酶），其在其视图中不存在于人体细胞中。 然而，这一断言不是基于任何证据，于2021年6月逆转。这种现象于7月2023日在小鼠中观察到，其中单一注射mRNA导致遗传修饰。 最近，疫苗刺激蛋白已在疫苗患者的肿瘤中发现[7]，表明它可以集成到基因组中，这一整合的第一个担心的结果是癌症的发展。 这一假设是由来自北德克萨斯大学的生物分子研究实验室（Neo7水科学）和研究人员的科学家恢复了4月中旬。 它们收集的分子数据表明，来自疫苗的RNA可以在宿主基因组中重新染色，永久改变基因调控。 他们还揭示了致癌物质和免疫崩溃。 2.免疫逸出穗蛋白（S2）抑制几种肿瘤抑制基因（P53，BRCA1 / 2，RB1）[9，[10，[10,11，结合，允许癌细胞通过免疫系统逃逸其检测和破坏。 流行病学家Nicolas Hulescher谈到了“坐下逆转”。 第一次研究证明穗蛋白与P53蛋白的干扰，也称为“基因组卫士”，于10月2021日发表[12]由Jiang等人发表。 该研究于5月2022年5月缩回，按安东尼Fauci的NIH命令。 在获取信息法案的访问下，已在获取此收回的电子邮件交换请求，但NIH仍拒绝传达490页的通信页面。 这些结果在2024年和5个月内通过Zhang和El Deiry [13]的体外证实了这些结果。 3. 3.修复改变的DNA机制疫苗穗蛋白诱导基因组改变并抑制DNA修复系统（江，张和ELEITY）。 这种机制通常在发生身体的攻击情况下进行，以防止可能促进癌症发作的突变，修复影响癌变或肿瘤抑制基因的误差。 [15]其改变诱导免疫缺陷是“直接患有癌症的直接途径”。 Moderna CeoStéphaneBACKEL专利的尖峰蛋白的战略序列是靶向基因（MSH3）[16，改变DNA修复缺陷[17]。 尖刺蛋白抑制这种机制的途径在Baiaran等人的文章中列出了[18，去年4月出版。 4.慢性炎症脂质纳米颗粒[19]，[20]用于疫苗mRNA的运输诱导炎症蛋白的大量分泌[21,22,23,24，（细胞因子风暴），为癌症出现铺平途径 这些细胞可能在整个器官中生长（包括血液干细胞[25）考虑穗蛋白的广义生物分布[26，[27，其中在三种文献中详细描述的致病性[28]，29 [30]，30且超过3 这种炎症会导致T细胞的耗尽，然后不再能够去除癌细胞。 GROK AI证实注射导致急性炎症，但这将在几天内（Bergamaschi，OGATA）解决，并且与其他疫苗相当。 他说，慢性炎症需要延长刺激，而“编程尖峰产量随着时间的推移限制（mRNA在几天内降解，几周内飙升），使慢性炎症不太可能。” 这一权利要求与一系列研究相矛盾[31]，包括最近的四种研究，其中血液血浆在注射后血浆中发现穗蛋白[32]（245天[33或12个月[34]，据其他研究），高达17个月[35] 在第一次注射后四年多，没有人真正知道身体是否停止生产它。 5.免疫系统失调mRNA疫苗接种导致抑制T细胞（淋巴细胞）[36）和对干扰素I型的反应，这在癌症的监测和增殖中起着至关重要的作用。 这些变化导致先天免疫有受损[38，[39，[40，[41]，以及适应性免疫反应的重新编程[42，[43,43。 据报道，中枢神经系统中免疫系统的放松管制[44]。 在Covid-19疫苗接种的背景下，该抑制确保适当合成晚期蛋白质和减少免疫活化。 有证据表明，在Mlanome刺激的癌症生长和转移的模型中，100％加入N1-甲基-Pseudourdin（M1-）到mRNA疫苗，而没有通过相反的结果诱导没有mRNA修饰的疫苗，表明Covid Rubio-casillas等。 点评：N1-Methyl-pseudouridine（M1'）：癌症的朋友或敌人？ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131427。 Grok Cites将由Biontech首席执行官Ugur Sahin进行的2020年研究[45]，该研究认为MRNA疫苗诱导疫苗后第一天检测到的持续CD4-和CD8-T细胞的稳健响应， 相反，辉瑞自身的临床数据显示在45％至46％的参与者中疫苗接种后6至8天降低，已知随着时间的推移恶化。 6. RNA破坏疫苗mRNA是一种改进的mRNA，用于提高其寿命和生产。 辉瑞和现代（密码子优化）使用的技术扰乱了微大罗氏，其是细胞增殖和死亡的关键球员，包括癌细胞[47]，[48]。 在2021的研究中显示，将疫苗尖峰蛋白质被运输到含微小RNA的囊泡（外来体）中，这将防止干扰素功能，从而抑制自然免疫，破坏细胞过程，例如肿瘤增殖或监测。 7.致癌途径的激活刺激蛋白质可疑是间接激活几种在肿瘤生长，增殖和细胞存活中发挥至关重要作用的途径（MAPK，PI3K / AKT / mTOR [50，[51,5 其慢性升高与可以在某些环境中促进癌症的炎症有关。 再次指出，没有正式的研究将这些紊乱联系起来对癌症，但最近的研究[53]重新践踏了某些致癌途径激活的代谢证据，包括在第二次或后周开发白血病的患者中的PI3K / MTOR途径。 8.肿瘤微环境脂质纳米颗粒（NPLS）通过增强的渗透性和保留（EPR）效应在组织中积聚，其特征在于肿瘤血管的渗透性增加，并且肿瘤中的纳米颗粒的延长保留 因此，NPLS引起癌细胞的更快差异[54] [55]，其可以解释病理学家和肿瘤学和肿瘤科学家描述的“涡轮癌”的现象，并在小鼠的研究中观察到[56]。 是否为其他尖峰诱导疾病有效的病原过程的加速度是如此？ 瑞典研究人员在2023年展示了穗蛋白不仅可以诱导阿尔茨海默病，而是将疾病孵化时间降低了80％[57]，导致新形式的“荨麻植物疾病”。 9.休眠癌症的觉醒通过Covid-19相关的炎症或疫苗接种可能影响癌症唤醒和转移复发的疫苗。 没有癌症多年没有癌症的患者突然在接受加油剂量的Covid-19疫苗后很快复发侵略性和爆炸性癌症。 这些病例在增强给药后肿瘤生长非常快。 这些涡轮癌癌症似乎越来越快，患者比我们预期的毒力更大，甚至那些多年来一直稳定的毒力。 公共卫生当局不愿意承认这种相关性。 这种现象在全世界发生了MRNA疫苗的施用。 Ian Brighthope教授。 大辩论：港口港对抗总理。 29 11月2024 SAR-COV-2刺蛋白熔化多个细胞的能力[60] [60] [61] [60] [60] [60] [60，[60，[60，解释包括癌症的Cascade-19并发症。 根据耶鲁大学教授Yuri L的说法，这种融合引起的Syncytia的形成确实可以促进癌症的开发或进展，特别是在预先存在的病变的情况下，也是转移形成和癌症结论。 精确，伊维菌素，其疗效对Covid-19的疗效迄今为止，具有100多项研究证实，具有许多抗肿瘤作用[63）（肿瘤干细胞的抑制，增殖，转移和血管生成活动，加速编程死亡 伊维菌素于2006年没有营养不良的安全水平，包括儿童和孕妇，根据世卫组织制作了一个必不可少的分子。 为什么在未知的mRNA注射的疗效，安全性和致癌潜力时不允许？ 问题应该迟早询问。 10.通过阻断免疫系统的第一线受体（Toll受体或TLR）的激活，改变修饰修饰的mRNA改变修饰mRNA使肿瘤细胞“不可见”。 Karik和Weissman，Pfizer的Covid疫苗背后的两位研究人员，于2005年解释