patrick.net

The issue at hand was not that Judges ruled and created injunctions against Trump. Because none of them actually created injunctions against Trump. What they did was issued TRO's Temporary Restraining Orders. Which were misused and went against the reason for creating them in the first place. TRO's are meant to keep perceived violent people from parties that fear them, until their case can be heard.

The left kept saying Joe Biden's admin had injunctions against his policies as well. The stark contrast here is, those injunctions were actually litigated in a courtroom with all parties present to present their side of the case. These rogue judges that issued TROs against Trump. Did so with only the NGO's and Liberal lawyers in the courtroom. Nobody from the DOJ or Trump's legal teams were present when those judges made those rulings. It was a gross misuse of our Justice system, and miscategorizing what happened and how it went down, only shields them from much needed retribution.

Trump wont be the last President, and their will be many more Obama's, Biden and G.W. Bush's to come. We need a fair and balanced court where grievances can be brought before a judge and litigated. They have to start somewhere, even if those courts wont be the final say on the matter.
The way Trump's policies were upended, was cowardice at large, they did not follow normal procedures, as everyone involved knew damn well that those cases would not hold up if both sides of the argument was heard.

Courts should be able hear grievances about legislation or administrations, then rule accordingly. Even if that ruling is only the first in a long series of legal battles all the way to the Supreme Court. I fear now going forward, when we're faced with another shit bird like Obama or Biden, cowardly Judges will say.
"You have no standing, I don't even have standing to stop them." No matter how outrageous those actions that are being challenged are.

The case should have been about not being able to cripple an administration with an arbitrary backroom TRO issued between two biased parties against the defendant, without them present, or any due process given to the other side's argument.