« First « Previous Comments 26 - 64 of 64 Search these comments
Just ask the 58% voters who voted against Bill Clinton in '92. If Perot 'split the votes evenly', that wouldn't have happened. He took more votes from Bush.
Wrong. This has been revised, the common stance these days is that it was a mostly even take
No vote is wasted if you vote for what you believe in
Of responding Perot voters surveyed by VRS, 51% preferred Clinton as a second choice compared to 42% for Bush.
I think his party is going to shave politically unsavvy people from both parties
mell says
Perot did take away votes fairly evenly,
False. Where rhe hell do you get this bullshit from?
mell says
Again, there's no problem with 3rd party candidates.
Two notorious Trump critics—billionaire Mark Cuban and disgraced former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci—have signaled interest in joining Elon Musk’s newly announced “America Party,” a political faction Musk claims is aimed at restoring “freedom” to the American people.
those who whine and blame about lost votes usually belong to a party/candidate that has failed to convince enough voters
mell says
those who whine and blame about lost votes usually belong to a party/candidate that has failed to convince enough voters
I thought you pitched the BS "there is no such thing as a lost vote"?
the listed treasurer is an Indian-born man named Vaibhav Taneja
It'll fizzle like a dud sparkler on the Fourth. The main reason for this is to get some leverage to trade at election time. Elon wants leverage.
Bill Clinton was a successful president by most metrics
It’s still early, but it looks like the new America party will be much more of a headache for Democrats than Republicans. The new third party is not a shot at the GOP’s base, which already has Trump. It’s a shot across the bow of the disillusioned Democrat diaspora: the Cuban-style former liberals who liked enterprise, science, and sanity, but got priced out of the party by DEI bureaucrats, bearded female swimmers loitering in girls’ bathrooms, and the constant nagging of the climate priests.
Strategically speaking, based on what we know, the America Party threatens to split the Left, not the Right. If it grows legs, Musk won’t hurt Trump. He’ll hurt Newsom, Whitmer, or whoever the Democrats march out next. Already suffering from NGO and union donations losses, ActBlue investigations, self-inflicted David Hogg PR scandals, cratering polls, and an incoherent platform, a new third option is the last thing the Democrats need.
It’s still early, but it looks like the new America party will be much more of a headache for Democrats than Republicans.
I'll go with whoever:
1. Prosecutes Fauci and all the other mass murderers.
2. Releases all the Epstein videos.
Even one of the two would be enough to draw my allegiance for a long time.
Even Clinton was a successful president by most metrics
I'll go with whoever:
1. Prosecutes Fauci and all the other mass murderers.
2. Releases all the Epstein videos.
Even one of the two would be enough to draw my allegiance for a long time.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=253586
Karl Denninger's take on why Elon will fail with this.
Prediction: "Dr" Fuckyoucci will peacefully die of old age in his bed.
« First « Previous Comments 26 - 64 of 64 Search these comments
Of course, on its face all that will do is split the right, giving Dems huge majorities and the WH despite not getting the majority vote.
In political science, it's called Duverger's Law.
This is how we got into WW1, the Fed and the Income Tax, kiddies. Also how we got BJ Bill into office.
Don't believe me? Google up the Bull Moose Party and the Reform Party.
BUT if you look closely at America Party's platform (or at least one of them floating around that Musk likes), it might pull some Democrats. At least the SV Techlord types.
-reduce debt, responsible spending only
-modernize military with ai/robotics
-pro tech, accelerate to win in ai
-less regulation across board but especially in energy
-free speech
-pro natalist
-centrist policies everywhere else