patrick.net

PILOT INCAPACITATION - Dec.4, 2024 Westjet Flight WS-129 (YYC-YVR) Calgary AB to Vancouver BC, Canada, first officer incapacitated
DR. WILLIAM MAKIS MD
JUL 7
∙
PREVIEW

飞行员丧失能力 - 2024年12月4日，Westjet航班WS-129（YYC-YVR）卡尔加里AB到加拿大温哥华，副驾驶无能为力
博士 威廉·马克斯（William Makis）医学博士
7月7日
∙
预览

STAY FREE, STAY INFORMED, STAY IN THE FIGHT………..
ABC TV PSY-OP
Covering up the likely cause of the rise in cancers
JUL 8

https://open.substack.com/pub/phillipaltman/p/abc-tv-psy-op

READ IN APP

RISE IN CANCERS A MYSTERY TO SOME “CANCER EXPERTS”

In my opinion, the publicly funded Australian national TV ( 4 Corners program) has aired a psy-op to try and cover up the cause of the dramatic rise in cancers since the rollout of the COVID injections. Mouthpiece Dr. Normal Swan suggests anything from junk food to environmental pollution might be to blame.

Share

For more information and opinion see Prof. Ian Brighthope’s Substack of 8 July. CLICK HERE

Many cancer “experts” were interviewed. However, the elephant in the room was not discussed……….All that is required is a survey of cancers since 2020 comparing the Covid vaccinated to the Covid unvaccinated. That would give the answer. That is exactly what they do not want to do. Notable cancer specialists around the world have been sounding the alarm since the rollout of the experimental gene-based shots but mainstream news media refuse to cover the story.

Below are just 3 of my many Substacks on this topic:

Substack 2 November 2024 - CLICK HERE

Substack 30 November 2024 - CLICK HERE

Substack 3 April 2025 - CLICK HERE

PFIZER BEING SUED FOR MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE CLAIMS

Kansas files lawsuits aginst Pfizer - the first of 5 states to do so.

CLICK HERE (11 min)

PFIZER BEING SUED IN HOLLAND FOR DEADLY BATCH

In the Dutch city of Leeuwarden Pfizer is being sued for an alleged deadly shipment of COVID-19 injections. Albert Bourla (CEO of Pfizer), Mark Rutte (former Dutch PM), Ursula von der Leyen (EU Commission President), Bill Gates (billionaire vaccine investor) and Klaus Schwab (founder of the Word Economic Forum are all linked to the scandal. CLICK HERE.

Thanks for reading Phillip Altman BPharm(Hons), MSc, PhD! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Subscribed
DISCLAIMER:

The information and personal opinions presented in this Substack is based on or derived from sources which I believe are credible and usually reliable. Any inadvertent errors or inaccuracies in my Substacks which come to my notice will be corrected as soon as possible. I endeavour to reference any relevant published information and provide links to websites so readers can do their own research. The opinions expressed are not intended nor should they be interpreted to be medical advice. I do not accept any liability for comments placed on my Substack and my failure to respond to any potentially defamatory or contentious comment should not be taken as passive or otherwise approval by myself. I neither seek nor receive any financial compensation for my writings.

MY SUBSTACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE FREE. I ENDEAVOUR TO BRING YOU THE TRUTH. PLEASE SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THAT IS ALL I ASK. 保持自由，保持知情，保持战斗…………..
ABC电视psy-op
掩盖了癌症上升的可能原因
7月8日

阅读应用程序

对一些“癌症专家”的癌症崛起

我认为，这项由公共资助的澳大利亚国家电视台（4 Corners Program）播出了PSY-OP，以掩盖自covid注射以来癌症急剧上升的原因。 烟嘴师范大天鹅博士建议可能归咎于垃圾食品到环境污染的任何事情。

分享

有关更多信息和意见，请参见Ian Brighthope教授的7月8日。 点击这里

采访了许多癌症“专家”。 但是，没有讨论房间中的大象…………。这是对癌症的调查，自2020年以来，将疫苗接种的疫苗与未接种疫苗接种的疫苗进行了比较。 那会给出答案。 这正是他们不想做的。 自从基于实验基因的镜头推出以来，世界各地著名的癌症专家一直在发出警报，但主流新闻媒体拒绝介绍这个故事。

以下只是我在此主题上的众多替代方案中的3个：

替代2024年11月2日 - 单击此处

替代2024年11月30日 - 单击此处

替代2025年4月3日 - 单击此处

辉瑞因误导和欺骗性的主张而被起诉

堪萨斯州提起诉讼Aginst Pfizer-这样做的5个州中的第一个。

单击此处（11分钟）

辉瑞在荷兰被起诉致命批次

在荷兰城市，Leeuwarden Pfizer被起诉，涉嫌致命的Covid-19注射。 阿尔伯特·伯拉（Pfizer的首席执行官），马克·鲁特（Mark Rutte）（前荷兰总理），欧盟·沃恩·莱恩（Ursula von der Leyen）（欧盟委员会主席），比尔·盖茨（Bill Gates）（亿万富翁疫苗投资者）和克劳斯·施瓦布（Klaus Schwab）（经济论坛的创始人都链接到丑闻。

感谢您阅读Phillip Altman Bpharm（荣誉），硕士学位，博士！ 免费订阅免费收到新帖子并支持我的工作。

订阅
免责声明：

此替代品中提出的信息和个人意见是基于或从我认为可靠且通常可靠的来源得出的。 我注意到的任何无意错误或不准确的错误或不正确的错误将尽快纠正。 我努力参考任何相关已发布的信息，并提供与网站的链接，以便读者可以进行自己的研究。 表达的意见不是故意的，也不应将其解释为医疗建议。 我对对我的替代方案发表的评论不承担任何责任，也不应对任何潜在的诽谤或有争议的评论做出反应，不应被我自己视为被动或以其他方式的批准。 我既没有为自己的著作寻求任何经济补偿。

我的替代订阅是免费的。 我努力为您带来真相。 请与朋友和家人分享。 这就是我要问的。

Data from the Australian federal government's cancer control agency shows that the proportion of cancer in some middle-aged and middle-aged people under the age of 50 is worrying. Between 2000 and 2024,
Among people aged 30 to 39, the following premature incidence cases increased significantly:
* 500% prostate cancer
*Pancreatic cancer 200%
*Hepatic cancer 150%
*Uterine cancer 138%
* 85% kidney cancer
Experts are looking for the reasons behind it.
澳大利亚联邦政府的癌症控制机构的数据显示，50岁以下中青年人的部分癌症患癌比例令人担忧。在2000年至2024年之间，
30至39岁人群中，以下癌症的早发病例显著增加：
*前列腺癌个500%
*胰腺癌个200%
*肝癌 150%
*子宫癌 个138%
*肾癌个85%
专家正在寻找背后的原因。

STAY FREE, STAY INFORMED, STAY IN THE FIGHT………..
PROBABILITY OF AUSTRALIAN COVID VAX DEATHS OCCURRING BY CHANCE
Grok gives the answer…..
JUL 9

READ IN APP

On 4 June I issued a Substack based on Dr. Susan Niblett’s interview with Topher Field. CLICK HERE.

In this Substack I referred to the 1042 deaths reported to the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration Drug Adverse Event Notification scheme (DAEN). Of these 1042 deaths reported (of course it is recognised that only about 1-2% of actual adverse events including deaths are officially reported), 35 cases of death occurred on the same day of COVID vaccination but none of these 35 cases were properly followed up by the TGA to assess if the COVID vaccine actually caused the deaths. This is amazing in itself and shows a gross level of incompetence and/or wilful blindness.

Share

Now, the TGA officially claim there have only been 14 deaths caused by the COVID vaccines so far. These deaths were obviously followed up and assessed by the TGA. Because the 35 deaths (above) are obviously not part of the cohort of 14 admitted deaths assessed by the TGA……it follows that the TGA are assuming these 35 deaths occurred by sheer chance on the same day as their COVID vaccination.

What are the chances that the TGA is correct?

So I asked the social media X artificial intelligence platform GROK to help answer this question. Below is the question I asked GROK and the response.

GROK QUESTION:

What is the probability that 35 Australians would die by sheer chance on the same day they received a Covid vaccine?

GROK ANSWER:

Calculating the exact probability of 35 Australians dying by sheer chance on the same day they received a COVID-19 vaccine requires several assumptions and data points, including the total number of vaccine doses administered, the baseline daily death rate in Australia, and the timing of vaccinations. Here's a reasoned approach based on available information:

1. **Total Vaccine Doses and Population**: As of early 2025, over 70 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered in Australia (based on cumulative data up to mid-2023 and ongoing rollout). The population is approximately 26 million, with eligible individuals (aged 5 and over) being around 24 million.

2. **Daily Death Rate**: The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) reports an average of about 450–500 deaths per day in recent years, though this varies with age and health conditions. During the pandemic, excess deaths have been noted, but the baseline pre-pandemic rate provides a starting point.

3. **Vaccination Rate and Timing**: Vaccines were administered at varying rates, with peak periods in 2021–2022. If we assume an average of 100,000–200,000 doses per day during the rollout (a rough estimate based on historical peaks), the number of people vaccinated on any given day could range widely.

4. **Probability Framework**: The probability of a person dying on a given day is approximately 450–500 / 26,000,000 = 0.000017–0.000019 (or 1.7–1.9 per 100,000). For a group of 100,000 vaccinated individuals on a single day, the expected number of deaths by chance would be 1.7–1.9. The likelihood of exactly 35 deaths occurring by chance in this group follows a Poisson distribution, where the probability of k events is given by

P(k) = (e-λ x λk)/k!

with λ being the expected number of deaths (e.g., 1.9).

For λ = 1.9 and k = 35

P(35) = e-19 x 1.935

This calculation yields an extremely small probability (on the order of 10-43, indicating that 35 deaths occurring by sheer chance in a single day's vaccination cohort is highly unlikely.

5. **Contextual Considerations**: The reported 35 deaths on the same day as vaccination (noted in some sources) occurred over the entire rollout period, not necessarily on a single day. If these 35 cases are spread across multiple days (e.g., over months or years), the probability per day becomes even lower, as the event is diluted across time. Additionally, correlation does not imply causation—many of these individuals may have had underlying conditions, and temporal association alone doesn’t confirm vaccine linkage.

6. **Critical Analysis**: Official reports (e.g., from the Therapeutic Goods Administration) indicate only 14 deaths were likely linked to vaccines out of nearly 1,000 investigated, suggesting most same-day deaths are coincidental given the large population and natural mortality rate. The lack of thorough investigation for all 35 cases (as noted in some reports) raises questions about data completeness, but it doesn’t inherently support a causal link.

**Conclusion**: The probability of 35 Australians dying by sheer chance on the same day as receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, if confined to a single day's cohort of 100,000–200,000 vaccinations, is astronomically low - effectively negligible, around 10-43. However, if these 35 deaths occurred across the entire vaccination campaign (over 70 million doses and several years), the event is less anomalous and more consistent with random variation, though still rare. Without precise daily vaccination and death data for each instance, a definitive probability can’t be calculated, but the TGA’s findings suggest most cases are not vaccine-related. For a more accurate assessment, detailed epidemiological data would be needed. END OF GROK RESPONSE

For those mathematically challenged, 10-43 means 1 divided by 10 raised to the power of 43 ie the probability that these 35 deaths occurred by chance is 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001

But the TGA say there is nothing to see here…move on.

Thanks for reading Phillip Altman BPharm(Hons), MSc, PhD! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Subscribed
DISCLAIMER:

The information and personal opinions presented in this Substack is based on or derived from sources which I believe are credible and usually reliable. Any inadvertent errors or inaccuracies in my Substacks which come to my notice will be corrected as soon as possible. I endeavour to reference any relevant published information and provide links to websites so readers can do their own research. The opinions expressed are not intended nor should they be interpreted to be medical advice. I do not accept any liability for comments placed on my Substack and my failure to respond to any potentially defamatory or contentious comment should not be taken as passive or otherwise approval by myself. I neither seek nor receive any financial compensation for my writings.

MY SUBSTACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE FREE. I ENDEAVOUR TO BRING YOU THE TRUTH. PLEASE SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THAT IS ALL I ASK. 保持自由，留意，留在战斗中.........。澳大利亚Covid vax死亡的可能性偶然的偶然会给Grok出现答案...... 7月9日在App中阅读了6月4日，我在Susan Niblett的采访中发布了一份基于顶级领域的家庭 点击这里。 在这封锁中，我提到的1042人死亡报告给澳大利亚治疗剂管理药物不良事件通知计划（Daen）。 在这1042人死亡中报告（当然，公认的是，只有大约1-2％的实际不良事件官方报告），在Covid疫苗接种的同一天发生了35例死亡，但这35个案件都不适当地进行TGA，以评估 这本身就是惊人的，表现出了无能的无能和/或故意失明的总体水平。 立即分享，TGA正式声称，到目前为止，Covid疫苗才有14人死亡。 这些死亡明显被TGA随访并评估。 因为35人死亡（上文）显然不是由TGA评估的14个入住的死亡队列的一部分......它遵循TGA假设这35人死亡在同一天发生的是他们的Covid疫苗接种。 TGA是正确的机会是什么？ 所以我问社交媒体x人工智能平台Grok帮助回答这个问题。 以下是我要求Grok和响应的问题。 GROK问题：在同一天的同一天，35澳大利亚人将死亡的可能性是什么，他们收到了一个covid疫苗？ GROK答案：计算35澳大利亚人死亡的确切概率在同一天的同一天死于他们收到的Covid-19疫苗需要若干假设和数据点，包括施用的疫苗剂量的总数，澳大利亚的基准每日死亡率以及澳大利亚的基准日常死亡率 这是一种基于可用信息的理由方法：1。**总疫苗剂量和人口**：截至2025年初，澳大利亚在澳大利亚进行了超过7000万剂Covid-19疫苗（基于2023年中期的累积数据和持续的卷 人口约为2600万，符合条件的个人（5岁及以上）约2400万。 2. **每日死亡率**：近年来，澳大利亚统计局（ABS）每天每天报告约450-500人死亡，尽管这随着年龄和健康状况而异。 在大流行期间，已经注意到过量的死亡，但基线预流行率提供了起点。 3. **疫苗接种率和时序**：疫苗以不同的速率给药，在2021-2022中具有高峰期。 如果我们在卷展栏期间平均每天每天达到100,000-200,000剂（基于历史峰值的粗略估计），则在任何给定的日接种的人数可以广泛地占据。 4. **概率框架**：在给定的一天死亡的人的概率约为450-500 / 26,000,000 = 0.000017-0.000019（或每10万人1.7-1.9）。 对于一天的一组100,000名疫苗接种的个体，偶然的预期死亡人数将是1.7-1.9。 在该组中发生恰当的35人死亡的可能性遵循泊松分布，其中k事件的概率由p（k）=（e-λxλk）/ k表示！ λ是预期的死亡人数（例如，1.9）。 对于λ= 1.9和k = 35 p（35）= e-19 x 1.935该计算产生极小的概率（大约10-43，表明在一天的疫苗接种队列中纯粹的机会发生了35人，这是极不可能的 所有35例缺乏彻底的调查（如某些报告所述）提出了关于数据完整性的问题，但它并没有完全支持因果关系。 **结论**：35澳大利亚人在同一天死亡的概率在接受Covid-19疫苗的同一天，如果限制在一天的100,000-200,000个疫苗接种的一天，则是天文的低有效忽略不计 但是，如果整个疫苗接种活动发生（超过7000万剂量），则该事件与随机变异不那么异常，更符合随机变异，但仍然很少见。 没有精确的每日疫苗接种和每次实例的死亡数据，无法计算确定的概率，但TGA的研究结果表明大多数情况下都没有疫苗相关。 为了更准确的评估，需要详细的流行病学数据。 数学上挑战的人的结束，10-43意味着1除以10升至43的力量，即这35个死亡偶然发生的可能性是0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 感谢您阅读Phillip Altman Bpharm（Hons），MSC，PHD！ 订阅免费接收新帖子并支持我的工作。 订阅免责声明：本家中提出的信息和个人意见基于或源自我认为是可信的，通常可靠的来源。 我的食品中的任何无意中的错误或不准确的错误都将尽快纠正。 我努力参考任何相关的发布信息，并提供网站的链接，因此读者可以进行自己的研究。 表达的意见并非打算被解释为医疗建议。 我不接受任何对我的家食的评论的任何责任，并且我未能应对任何潜在的诽谤或有争议的评论，不应作为我自己被动或其他批准。 我既不寻求也没有收到任何对我的作品的财务补偿。 我的家喻阀是免费的。 我努力为你带来真相。 请与朋友和家人分享。 这就是我问的一切。